Benefits of Glulam Timber Roof Structure for Airport Passenger Terminal Buildings
Abstract
Airport passenger terminals vary in shape, form and interior design. Most of the terminals' roof structure at the uppermost building level is a steel structure with a curved shape and false ceiling/cladding to give a pleasant view. Very few buildings have a concrete roof at this level. Nowadays, designers look for green building materials such as timber instead of steel, as wood has many advantages. Architects understand the importance of architectural features of the passenger terminals while conceptualizing the design to create an attraction with an element of uniqueness. An airport in the Philippines utilized Glulam as a roof structure material for the passenger terminal building and achieved its design intent matching local culture. The terminal received appreciation from all the stakeholders and proved the rationale for choosing this material. It is also essential to be aware of the limitations of glulam material, and adequate care is taken during planning, implementation and maintenance of the asset. Selection of suitable materials, construction methodology and project management ensures delivery of the projects in timeAirport passenger terminals vary in shape, form and interior design. Most of the terminals' roof structure at the uppermost building level is a steel structure with a curved shape and false ceiling/cladding to give a pleasant view. Very few buildings have a concrete roof at this level. Nowadays, designers look for green building materials such as timber instead of steel, as wood has many advantages. Architects understand the importance of architectural features of the passenger terminals while conceptualizing the design to create an attraction with an element of uniqueness. An airport in the Philippines utilized Glulam as a roof structure material for the passenger terminal building and achieved its design intent matching local culture. The terminal received appreciation from all the stakeholders and proved the rationale for choosing this material. It is also essential to be aware of the limitations of glulam material, and adequate care is taken during planning, implementation and maintenance of the asset. Selection of suitable materials, construction methodology and project management ensures delivery of the projects in time.
Downloads
References
C. J. Van Oel and F. W. D. Van den Berkhof, “Consumer preferences in the design of airport passenger areas,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 36, pp. 280–290, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.005.
S. J. Bell, “Image and consumer attraction to intraurban retail areas: An environmental psychology approach,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 67–78, Apr. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0969-6989(98)00015-0.
L. W. Turley and R. E. Milliman, “Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 193–211, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00010-7.
Q. M. Basim and S. S. Vladimirovich, “the Involvement of Structural Systems in Airport Terminals Forming and Architecture,” space&FORM, vol. 2019, no. 38, pp. 9–20, 2019, doi: 10.21005/pif.2019.38.b-01.
Capgemini, “the Business Case for Building,” p. 19, 2007.
K. I. Crews, Nonconventional timber construction. Elsevier Ltd, 2019.
M. H. Ramage et al., “The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 68, no. October 2016, pp. 333–359, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107.
J. L. Skullestad, R. A. Bohne, and J. Lohne, “High-rise Timber Buildings as a Climate Change Mitigation Measure - A Comparative LCA of Structural System Alternatives,” Energy Procedia, vol. 96, no. 1876, pp. 112–123, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.112.
N. Iarova and N. Iarova, “ODPORNO ŚĆ OGNIOWA DREWNA KLEJONEGO GLULAM FIRE RESISTANCE,” pp. 30–36, 2016.
R. C. Moody and R. Hernandez, “Glued-Laminated Timber,” Eng. Wood Prod. A Guid. Specif. Des. Users, pp. 1–39, 1997.
P. C. Raposo et al., “Mechanical Properties of Wood Construction Materials from a Building from the 19 th Century,” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 5, pp. 1097–1101, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.087.
P. Dietsch, S. Franke, B. Franke, A. Gamper, and S. Winter, “Methods to determine wood moisture content and their applicability in monitoring concepts,” J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–127, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s13349-014-0082-7.
V. Ermakov and E. Stepanova, “Moisture content and its influence on glued timber structures,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 869, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/5/052015.
E. Frühwald Hansson, “Analysis of structural failures in timber structures: Typical causes for failure and failure modes,” Eng. Struct., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2978–2982, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2011.02.045.
P. Rubner, “WOOD CULTURE 21,” Infrastruct. Constr., no. 01/19.
M. L. Batchelar and K. A. Mcintosh, “Structural Joints in Glulam,” NZ Timber Des. J., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 13–20, 2012.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ravi Lakshmanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I/We agree with the provision of the Bye-Law 118 of The Institution of Engineers (India) which states that copyright of each paper published in Institution Journal or Annual Technical Volume in full or in Abstract at its centres shall lie with the Institution.
